• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

The Aristos Group

MENU
  • Home
  • About
  • Employers
  • COVID-19
  • Referrals
  • IELTS Training
  • Visa Assistance
  • Blog
  • Contact

Blog

NHS to rely on migrants after Brexit – Until they train more UK nurses

19 January, 2020

NHS buckling under the weight of rising demand and is facing severe staffing shortages

With recruits from the European Union beginning to leave the NHS in greater numbers, the question of how to staff English hospitals and care homes becomes more acute.  More than 40,000 nursing roles are currently unfilled amid a sector-wide crisis.  Experts warn three things need to happen simultaneously to begin to bridge the gap: 

  • more recruits from abroad
  • training more UK nurses, and
  • keeping hold of the current workforce

After visa restrictions were relaxed in 2018, last year saw the number of nurses arriving from outside the European Economic Area double to more than 8,000, but with average nursing wages in the UK lagging behind competitors, and an historic reliance on migrant labour, solving the staffing shortage will be an uphill battle.

Mark Dayan, policy analyst at health think tank the Nuffield Trust, said continued migration into the UK is critical.  “The NHS has a long-term tendency to rely on non-UK migration,” he said. “The NHS is also more dependent on migrants than other sections of the economy are on average.”

But Ben Gershlick, senior economist at the Health Foundation, said international recruitment will not be enough to solve the staffing crisis alone.   “A continued over-reliance on nurses from abroad places the UK in a precarious position for the future,” he said. “It is crucial for the future of the health service that the government secures the long-term supply of new nurses in the UK.”

The NHS staffing crisis is most acute among nurses and midwives, with more than 1 in 10 positions going unfilled. That leaves more than 40,000 vacancies across NHS England.  The worst affected area is London, where more than 15 per cent of nursing roles were being advertised in June last year.  It leaves a shortfall of more than 10,000 nursing posts across the capital – a quarter of all vacancies in England.

In their general election manifesto the Conservatives committed to funding 50,000 more nurses over the next five years – increasing nursing numbers from 280,000 to 330,000 by 2024/25.  31,500 of these new posts will be new, including 14,000 newly-trained nurses, 5,000 nursing apprentices and 12,500 nurses from overseas. The remaining 18,500 will be nurses who have been persuaded not to leave, or to return to, the profession.

Measures to shore up the front line have already seen some success. In 2018 doctors and nurses were exempted from the Tier 2 visa cap which limits the number of skilled migrants entering the UK to 20,000 a year.  The result was a net increase of 4,000 nurses a year from outside the EEA.  “In the short- to medium-term more nurses are required from abroad than are currently being attracted in order to keep the NHS running,” said Mr Gershlick.   “The government must therefore ensure that the migration policy does not put barriers in the way of recruiting nurses from both EU and non-EU countries.”

The fresh influx of nurses from outside the EU is generally benefiting the capital, the East and the Midlands – the areas with some of the highest vacancy rates for doctors and nurses, and reliance on migrant labour.  Those areas have seen the number of nurses from abroad rise by more than 1,000 a year since 2018, while northern England struggles to attract fresh talent from overseas.

Migration alone won’t solve the problem. Many more nurses also need to be trained in the UK – something seen as a key opportunity from Brexit.  In June 2015, nurses from the UK were leaving NHS England at a rate of more than 2,500 a year. At the same time, the number of EU nurses increased by 3,500.  In the four years since, after the EU referendum vote, the trend has reversed.  In the year to June 2019, nurses from outside the EEA increased by more than 4,000, while European nurses begin to leave the NHS.

For the first time in years more UK nationals are joining the NHS after a drive to encourage staff to return and boost retention rates.  Almost 1,500 more UK nurses joined NHS England than left in the 12 months to June, but more are needed.  “The NHS is failing to train and recruit enough new nurses domestically and retain enough of those it has,” said Mr Gershlick.

“While the number of people in England starting nursing degrees was up in 2018, this was still some way short of the additional 4,000 nurses in training by 2023/24 pledged in the long term plan for the NHS.”  Sources of recruitment have always fluctuated, according to Mr Dayan, but “there is a level of dependence we have built up on migrant nurses”.   “There have been cycles of the NHS having workforce shortages, either because they haven’t trained enough people or there haven’t been staff to match vacancies,” he said.   “We then need to recruit from overseas in waves to match it.  “In the 2000s when we had large increases in the NHS budget we used non-EU migrants quite heavily to grow the workforce in every area.  “In the middle of the last decade we had a spike in EEA migration, which got up to nearly 10,000 a year, but dropped off a cliff with Brexit and the language test.”

Difficulties attracting new recruits into training or moving to the UK to work in the NHS have various factors, including pay.  The Government has pledged to reintroduce nursing bursaries, worth up to £8,000, to try to entice more students to train in the UK. This would give every student nurse an annual bursary of £5,000 for living costs, with up to £3,000 more for those in particular areas of need.  But once they are in the profession, average wages for nurses in the UK measure poorly against the health services in other countries.  According to OECD data, nurses in the UK are paid in line with the average UK salary.  It amounts to less compared to average wages in countries including Greece, Ireland, Australia, the United States and Chile, where nurses are paid 1.5 times the national average wage.

Mr Gershlick said: “A global nursing shortage means the UK is competing internationally for scarce nurses and this is likely to become increasingly challenging as other high income countries such as Germany become more active recruiters.”  While staff from the EU dry up, the NHS is falling back on historically reliable sources of recruitment.  Staff from the Philippines and India now make up the bulk of nurses from overseas, with more than 30,000 of those registered with the Nursing and Midwifery Council from the Philippines.  The UK has pledged not to recruit from Indian states which are in receipt of aid from the British Government, but the rest of India is not covered by the agreement.

And Britain has a memorandum of understanding with the Philippine Government allowing it to target healthcare professionals.  In the last two years, the number of Filipino recruits has grown by more than 20 per cent, while those from Spain, Portugal and Romania quit.  And while the Asian labour market can provide a vast recruitment pool, there are concerns around the ethics of sourcing staff from poorer countries.   “In both India and the Philippines the recruitment pool is quite deep,” said Mr Dayan. But he added there is a concern over sourcing recruitment from less-developed countries where they are needed.

Experts warn that poor performance in hospital waiting times are directly impacted by the staffing crisis, and that the only way to deal with this is through a combination of improved training, retention and migration.  “The only chance to deliver the 50,000 nurses the Prime Minister promised is increased training, better retention and higher migration,” said Mr Dayan. “It would need about 5,000 additional migrants a year.”  Stopping nurses leaving the profession is just as important. Since 2011/12, around 30,000 more NHS staff are resigning each year, according to workforce data.

Andrea Sutcliffe CBE, chief executive and registrar for the Nursing and Midwifery Council, said: “More needs to be done to address the pressures nurses and midwives face to successfully attract and retain the workforce we need.  “In our last survey of those leaving the register, one third cited too much pressure leading to stress and poor mental health as a reason for leaving.

“These are system-wide challenges that require a system-wide solution – including effective workforce planning, a joined up approach across health and social care and ongoing support for continuing professional development both to benefit people who use services, and create an attractive career pathway for new recruits and existing staff.  “While recent investment by the Government in establishing a grant for student nurses and midwives is a step in the right direction, there is still much more to be done.” 

An NHS spokesperson said: “It’s no secret that the NHS needs more beds, which means we need more nurses from home and abroad.  “This is why the NHS has funded thousands more clinical placements for those in training, delivered a 6 per cent increase in nursing applications as a result of the largest ever recruitment campaign, and rolled out a successful nurse retention programme which has reduced turnover rates.” 

Contact us for a confidential discussion and refer family, friends and colleagues and be rewarded.

Brexit: NHS faces uncertainty as health workers leave UK

Facebook Linkedin Youtube

Filed Under: Blog, Brexit, NHS Tagged With: doctor, immigration, midwife, nurse, recruitment, visa

BLOG SERIES – WORKING IN THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES (UAE) – PART 7

18 January, 2020

United Arab Emirates: Five-year Tourist Visa Scheme Announced

The UAE’s first multi-entry five-year tourist visa will encourage travellers to become ‘repeat visitors’ and spend more while they are in the Emirates, experts said.  Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid, Prime Minister and Ruler of Dubai, said the visa would be implemented in the next four months as part of a drive to establish the country as a ‘major global tourism destination’.  It will allow tourists multiple entries into the country over the five period, instead of having to apply for entry for each visit. It is not clear if there will be a visa application fee and no other details have yet been released.  At present, tourists can visit the UAE with a free multiple entry visa for up to 90 days, from the date of entry.

“Dubai will be on the radar as a longer term option especially in the winter months,” said Maggie Bootsman, general manager of Travel Counsellors UAE.  “This is a fantastic opportunity to allow people into the UAE for a longer period of time.”  Apart from tourists from India, Pakistan and the Philippines who can visit their family more frequently, it will attract visitors from Europe, Africa and South America who travel to the region.  “It gives tourists visiting the region a window of opportunity to experience all that Dubai and the UAE have to offer,” Ms Bootsman said.  “We have a lot of visitors from South Africa to the region. Australians too come here but for a very short period. Once they visit, they will understand there is more depth so they will be interested in staying longer.”

The new system will help streamline visa requirements. While South Africans apply before they arrive in the country and pay Dh380 for a 30-day visa, Australians are eligible for a free 30-day visa on arrival at the airport.  Citizens from nations including the US, UK, Canada, Japan and China do not require advance visas.  The Cabinet decision included a visa waiver for Mexican citizens that will be implemented along with the five-year visa in the first quarter of the year, according to Wam news agency.

While recent government figures show a drop off in numbers of Indian, British and Russian tourists, Dubai welcomed 12 million visitors in the first nine months of 2019.  The Cabinet decision could have wide-ranging benefits, Ms Bootsman said.  “When people know they can spend more time here, it could be an opportunity for them to look at holiday apartments in Dubai,” she said.  “This was blocked in the past because they couldn’t spend more time here but now they will be willing to invest more which will be a great boost.”

Premjit Bangara, general manager of Sharaf Travel in Dubai, said repeat visits would have a positive impact on the economy.  “The flexibility it provides is the defining change. It will encourage more travel. We are looking at people who will want to come again and again,” he said.  “After one visit, people now think that another visa costs too much. But a five-year visa will turn a first-timer into a second and third-timer.”  Longer visits will also prompt travellers to head to other emirates.  “When it’s a single entry, people visit another country. A multi-entry will draw people back again like a magnet,” Mr Bangara said.“  It’s not just Dubai and Abu Dhabi, tourists will have time to visit Fujairah and Al Ain as well.  They can space their visits out and get to know the country.”

Information about the visa fee and the duration of stay is awaited to analyse how the five-year tourist visa will stimulate tourism.  “It’s important for us to understand how long an individual will be allowed to stay in country,” said Marcin Kubarek, senior manager at Fragomen, an immigration services firm.  “After the Cabinet announcement, there will be a ministerial resolution issued giving the additional terms and conditions. Every facilitation of mobility into the country helps boost tourism, investment and business activity and this visit visa comes just at the right time.”  It would spark interest among visiting businessmen to return with family.  “As a tourism and business hub, Dubai and the UAE attracts people from South Asia, Africa, the Philippines,” Mr Kubarek said.  “This will open the markets of the UAE to potential partners doing business here who will want to spend their holidays in the country and explore the eastern and northern emirates.”

UAE Announced 5 Year Tourist Visa l Big News l For All Nationalities

Facebook Linkedin Youtube

Filed Under: Blog, UAE, Visa Tagged With: Dubai, international, opportunity, residency, UAE, visa

Australian Visas Designed To Assist Regional Employers And Regional Communities

17 January, 2020

Employ or sponsor someone

The Australian government is assisting regional employers and regional communities through providing access to a wide range of visas tailored to meet their needs.

The new regional provisional visas will add to existing programs that provide a range of migration options to employers in regional Australia and people nominated for visas in regional Australia.

There will also be greater incentives for regional employers to nominate skilled workers, additional points for points-tested migrants who want to settle in regional Australia, and faster processing of skilled people nominated by employers in regional areas.

Australia gives some visa holders permission to work in Australia. You can:

  • employ or sponsor skilled workers who are already in Australia and have a visa that allows them to work
  • employ or sponsor other skilled workers who may be in Australia on another type of visa which does not currently allow them to work
  • sponsor skilled workers to come to Australia to work for you

Existing visa holders who are allowed to work in Australia might have work restrictions on their visas such as:

  • working for a specific employer or in a certain place – these visa holders may already be sponsored and employed by an employer in Australia
  • restricted to working for a specific number of hours per week such as an existing Student visa holder
  • restrictions on how long they may work for a particular employer such as a Working Holiday visa holder

Contact us for a confidential discussion and refer family, friends and colleagues and be rewarded.

Australian Immigration News Video December 2019 - Changes 491 visa & 494 visa Regional Rush & more!

Facebook Linkedin Youtube

Filed Under: Australia, Blog, Visa Tagged With: australia, immigration, jobs, opportunity, residency, visa

Britain is almost out of the EU—but what next?

17 January, 2020

Boris Johnson looks like a strong prime minister, but his position with Brussels is weak

The impact of Boris Johnson’s election win was clear on January 7th when Parliament resumed consideration of the eu withdrawal bill. A huge Tory majority made the debate and votes perfunctory. The Lords may be less controllable than the Commons, but the bill will become law largely unamended so Brexit can happen on January 31st. Mr Johnson hopes then to drop the very word Brexit, arguing that trade talks will be technical stuff more suited to business than front pages.

In fact Brexit will still not be done on January 31st. Britain will move into an 11-month transition period when it must obey all the eu’s rules and keep paying into its budget. And the future talks will cover not just trade but standards, security, data exchange, fisheries, financial services, research and much else. Moreover, as Ursula von der Leyen, the commission president, made clear at her meeting with Mr Johnson at Downing Street on January 8th, they will be even more difficult than the withdrawal negotiations.

Changes to the withdrawal bill will not help. It now bans by law any extension of the transition period beyond 2020. Promises to safeguard workers’ rights post-Brexit have gone, in line with Mr Johnson’s plan to escape eu regulations. And the bill dumps provisions giving mps a big role in scrutinising and voting on future deals with the eu. The aim is to avoid the misery that beset Mr Johnson’s predecessor, Theresa May, as she repeatedly failed to win parliamentary approval for her Brexit deal.

All this fits with a much-loved Brexit trope that the way to win a good deal in Brussels is just to hang tough. The notion is that setting firm conditions and deadlines will force the eu to make concessions, that the 27 member countries are likely to prove disunited under pressure, that the Europeans need the British more than the other way round and that sticking with Brussels’s rules is wrong in principle and also unnecessary to preserve close trade links.

On her visit to London, Mrs von der Leyen spoke eloquently of her deep friendship and admiration for Britain. Yet she was steely when talking of future relations. The end-year deadline made a comprehensive deal impossible. As a third country, Britain would have less privileged trade access. Without free movement of people, it could not have free movement of capital, goods and services. Although the eu wants a trade deal with zero tariffs and zero quotas, she added a third condition of “zero dumping”. This is code for a level playing-field under which Britain is required to observe eu rules in such fields as labour, taxes, the environment and state aid. The more Britain diverges from such rules, the greater the barriers to its exports.

The truth is that Mr Johnson, like Mrs May before him, is in a weak bargaining position. The withdrawal agreement deals with money owed after Brexit, the rights of eu citizens in Britain and, via customs checks in the Irish Sea, the guarantee of an open border between Northern Ireland and Ireland. The eu 27 have learnt the value of unity from previous talks, and unlike Britain they have experienced trade negotiators. And size matters: the eu accounts for almost half of Britain’s exports, while Britain takes barely a tenth of the eu’s.

The agreed political declaration also sets awkward staging posts on the way to a deal. By July 1st it envisages agreements on fish and on future regimes for financial services and data exchange. Mrs von der Leyen suggested these might rely on a system of regulatory equivalence, but she made clear this would be unilateral and could be withdrawn at any time. Even Mr Johnson’s big majority may be a weakness, suggests Maddy Thimont Jack of the Institute for Government, a think-tank. eu leaders often win arguments by claiming their parliaments cannot agree, but they know Mr Johnson is not so constrained.

The end-year deadline causes another problem. Comprehensive trade deals of the sort Mr Johnson wants are invariably “mixed” agreements that need ratification by national and regional parliaments, which typically takes years, not months. If a deal is to be ratified by next January, it must be a simple one not subject to this procedure. That points to goods trade only, with nothing on services, security and so on. And Mr Johnson’s insistence that Britain must have freedom to diverge from European regulations makes it harder to meet the timetable. David Henig, a trade expert, wonders if Britain could go for divergence in principle but not in practice. After all, most companies prefer eu rules they understand to an entirely new regime.

Some ministers suggest putting more pressure on Brussels by opening trade talks with other countries, notably America. But although Donald Trump is beguiling, trade aficionados say the Americans are even tougher than the eu. They would insist on acceptance of their food, which would stymie any deal with Europe since the eu bars much of it on health grounds. Any third country would also want to see how Britain will trade with the eu before doing bilateral deals. Besides, British negotiators will have their work cut out merely trying to roll over the 60-odd free-trade deals that the eu now has with third countries like Japan, Mexico and South Korea.

The conclusion is that, if Mr Johnson refuses to move on the transition deadline or on regulatory divergence, he will get only a bare-bones deal eliminating tariffs, but not regulatory barriers, for goods. This might be expanded in future negotiations, but only after a break in today’s close relationship. The alternative would be to leave on December 31st with no trade deal at all, but that would imply not just regulatory barriers but tariffs and quotas as well.

The industries that will suffer most from new regulatory barriers to frictionless trade are those like aerospace, cars, chemicals, food and drink, and pharmaceuticals that rely on uninterrupted supply chains across Europe. They are concentrated in the midlands and north—exactly where Mr Johnson won his new Tory majority. If his weakness in the negotiations causes him to lose favour in those areas, his new domestic strength will be at risk.

European Commission President wants 'unprecedented' Brexit trade deal by end of 2020 | ITV News

Facebook Linkedin Youtube

Filed Under: Blog, Brexit, UK Tagged With: immigration, international, jobs, recruitment, thearistosgroupinternational, visa

Australian Businesses – Information RE: Company Specific Labour Agreements

16 January, 2020

Company Specific Labour Agreements

The company-specific labour agreement is for an employer where:

  • a genuine skills need is not already covered by an industry labour agreement and
  • a designated area migration agreement or project agreement is not in place

 

Show your skill needs:

You must show that you have an exceptional need that cannot be met by Australian workers. Provide evidence:

  • of the niche skills you seek from overseas
  • of your many and diverse recruitment efforts
  • showing a detailed job description including tasks

 

The positions you seek to fill with workers from overseas are for skilled labour. They are not for unskilled labour. The positions must be:

  • at the Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations (ANZSCO) occupation skill level1 to 4 
  • not an eligible occupation on the Temporary Skill Shortage visa (subclass 482) 

 

The skilled workers from overseas generally must:

  • have at least 2 years of relevant work experience
  • meet the ANZSCO skill requirements for that occupation
  • meet any industry registration or licensing requirements
  • You must also meet the salary and employment conditions of the Temporary Skill Shortage visa (subclass 482).

 

Show your workforce needs:

The company-specific labour agreement is a temporary solution only. You must show that:

  • the workers from overseas will not be more than one-third of your total workforce
  • you have a plan in place to train and employ Australians so you do not need a future labour agreement

 

Workers from overseas must meet the English language requirements of the short-term stream of the Temporary Skill Shortage visa (subclass 482). 

 

Be an Australian business with good standing:

You must:

  • be an Australian registered business with good standing
  • show that your business has been lawfully and actively operating in Australia for at least 12 months
  • show evidence of financial viability provided by a chartered or certified practicing accountant. You must show that you can support the proposed number of workers from overseas you seek
  • show that there is no adverse information about your business. You must not have broken a law in any jurisdiction of Australia, nor be under investigation for breaking the law by any appropriate authority
  • not be insolvent
  • not have provided false or misleading information in any form to any appropriate authority at any time

 

Show you have consulted with industry stakeholders:

You must also consult with all relevant stakeholders. These may include:

  • the industry body
  • the relevant union
  • any community group the agreement impacts, such as schools or health services

 

Provide the following information to stakeholders:

  • number of workers from overseas in each year of the agreement, and their occupations
  • location of their workplace
  • the proposed salary, relevant awards and how you came to this amount
  • any concessions you seek to the Temporary Skill Shortage program
  • details of training for your Australian workforce to reduce your reliance on workers from overseas

 

Give stakeholders 10 working days to respond. Follow up if there is no response and provide a further 5 working days for a response. Provide detailed information on your stakeholder consultation when you lodge your labour agreement request.

Contact us for a confidential discussion and refer family, friends and colleagues and be rewarded.

10 Things About an Employer Sponsored RSMS subclass 187 Australian visa

Facebook Linkedin Youtube

Filed Under: Australia, Blog, Visa Tagged With: australia, career, immigration, jobs, recruitment, visa

Australian Skilled Occupation Lists To Change – Eligibility for Certain Visas Also Likely To Change

15 January, 2020

The new Skilled Migration Occupation Lists are expected to be released in March 2020

The Australian government has released a bulletin identifying the list of occupations that are under consideration for a change in status on the Skilled Migration Occupation Lists, which are lists used to determine eligibility for the country’s skilled visa programs.

Following the government’s review, certain occupations may be removed or moved between these lists, which would impact employers’ ability to utilise the employer-based temporary and permanent visa programs.

Specifically as it relates to the Temporary Skill Shortage visa program, occupations that are moved to the Short-term Skilled Occupation List are subject to more restrictive grant periods, and importantly, do not provide visa holders with a pathway to permanent residency.

The next steps of the review include a formal submission period for commentary that will open February 2020, and the publication of the lists in March 2020.

The Australian Department of Employment, Skills, Small and Family Business has released a bulletin identifying the list of occupations that are under consideration for a change in status on the:

  • Short-term Skilled Occupation List (STSOL)
  • Medium and Long-Term Strategic Skills List (MLTSSL) and
  • Regional Occupation List (ROL)

Which are lists used to determine eligibility for Australia’s skilled visa programs.

Highlights of possible changes set out in the bulletin include:

Move of Geologist category. The Geologist category would move from the STSOL to the ROL – Recognition by the Department that the shortages in industries such as resources and oil and gas, which are primarily located in regional areas, are facing a real shortage of skilled labour in this category.

Move of Sales and Marketing Manager categories. The Sales and Marketing Manager categories would move from the STSOL to the MLTSSL, with a salary requirement of at least AUD 120,000 per year. This will improve the ability to attract and retain highly specialised Sales and Marketing Managers.

Move of data-related categories. New and emerging occupations such as Blockchain Manager and Data Scientists, by identifying the appropriate Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations (ANZSCO) occupations (Information and Communications Technology Project Manager and Information and Organisation Professionals respectively) to move to the MLTSSL with a salary requirement of at least AUD 90,000.

Move of care categories. Aged or Disabled Carer, Nursing Support Worker and Personal Care Assistant, previously off-list, to be added to the STSOL in recognition of the growing need for labour in the aged care sector.

Following the government’s review of the proposed changes, the addition, removal or movement of occupations between these lists impacts employers’ ability to utilise the employer-based temporary and permanent visa programs.

Specifically as it relates to the Temporary Skill Shortage (TSS) visa program, occupations that are moved to the STSOL are subject to more restrictive grant periods, and importantly, do not provide visa holders with a pathway to permanent residency.

The publication of the bulletin is the most recent step in the review of the Skilled Migration Occupation lists that was announced in September 2019.

During the review a number of occupations were put forward to the Department as part of the consultation process, including Mechanical Engineering Technician, Geologist, Sales and Marketing Manager, Retail Buyer as well as emerging roles associated with Data Science and Data Analysis.

Further, written submissions were submitted that presented empirical data and evidence to support claims of skills shortages in the relevant occupations.  A number of those occupations have now been flagged in the bulletin.

The Department will review the Skilled Migration Occupation Lists to ensure they are responsive to the skills needs across Australia. A formal submission period for commentary on the lists will open February 2020.

The new Skilled Migration Occupation Lists are expected to be released in March 2020. 

We will keep you informed of the changes and likely impacts and please feel free to Contact us for a confidential discussion and refer family, friends and colleagues and be rewarded.

Australian Immigration News Video December 2019 - Changes 491 visa & 494 visa Regional Rush & more!

Facebook Linkedin Youtube

Filed Under: Australia, Blog, Visa Tagged With: australia, immigration, international, opportunity, recruitment, visa

Visa options for South Africans wanting to migrate to Australia

14 January, 2020

There are some good options, but navigating the system is complex and can be frustrating

We will explore some of the ways you can gain permanent residency and citizenship for you and your family in Australia.  But be warned it can be difficult to know where to start and which visa to apply for.

There are generally three visa streams available for South Africans that want to migrate to Australia:

  • the family stream
  • the work stream and
  • the business or investment stream

These streams have many different visa subclasses for specific immigration situations.  It’s not a one size fits all approach.  The best advice is to get advice from someone who knows how to navigate the process and provide the best advice.  So here we go.

Family stream

If your family member is an Australian citizen or permanent resident, you could join them on a family-stream permanent residence visa. Here are two common visa categories in this stream:

Partner visas

These visas allow partners and spouses of Australian citizens and permanent residents to live in Australia permanently.  They’re separated into two categories for applying from within Australia (subclasses 820 and 801) and for applying from outside Australia (subclasses 309 and 100).  Each category has a temporary and a permanent visa, but you apply for both at the same time.

 

Parent visas

There several different subclasses of parent visas covering the spectrum of temporary and permanent stay in the country. The permanent options require you to pass the balance of family test, meaning that more than half of your children need to be Australian citizens or permanent residents.

One visa that doesn’t hinge on this requirement and has relatively low processing times compared to permanent visas is the Sponsored Parent (Temporary) visa (subclass 870). This allows parents of Australian citizens or permanent residents to visit for up to five years at a time, but unfortunately won’t lead to permanent residence.  There’s also the option of applying for one of the permanent visas and staying in Australia on a bridging visa while you wait for approval.

 

 

Work stream

If you’re looking to live and work in Australia permanently, you can do so with a work visa.

 

Employer-sponsored visas

This category of visas allows an Australian employer to sponsor you to work in the country. The Employer Nomination Scheme visa (subclass 186) requires you to have an occupation on the list of eligible skilled occupations.  There’s also a Temporary Skill Shortage visa (subclass 482) for jobs on the skilled shortage list. This can potentially lead to permanent residence.

 

Skilled visas

The Skilled Independent visa (subclass 189) is a popular route that lets you live and work anywhere in Australia. You don’t need job offer for this visa – eligibility works on a points system. If you can get enough points based on age, work experience and education level, you can apply.

If you fall short of the requirements of the independent visa, you may still be eligible for the Skilled Nominated visa (subclass 190). You’ll need a nomination from an Australian state or territory, which you can get by having an occupation in demand for that region.

A third option for recent engineering graduates is the Skilled—Recognised Graduate visa (subclass 476). You’ll need to be under 31 and have completed your engineering degree within the past two years.

 

 

Business or investment stream

Setting up a business or investing in Australia is an excellent way to gain permanent residency if you have the means to do so.  The Business Talent visa (subclass 132) is perfect for business owners, investors or property developers looking to gain permanent residency in Australia. A popular route is to form or join a property development company in the country to qualify.

Other options include the Business Innovation and Investment visas (subclasses 188 and 888). There are various streams that fall under this category, depending on if you’re investing a large sum or you’re an entrepreneur.

 

Other options

If you don’t qualify for any of the various permanent residence visas on offer in the family, work or business visa streams, there are some other ways to qualify for permanent residency. These include the new skilled regional temporary visa, or the Distinguished Talent visa (subclass 491 and 858).

The Distinguished Talent visa is granted in the case of internationally recognised, exceptional and outstanding achievement in eligible fields, including the arts, academia, research, sport or a profession.

 

The path to an Australian passport

Once you’ve been in Australia for a while, you may be eligible to become an Australian citizen if you meet all the requirements.  You must have spent four years in Australia on a valid visa and have held permanent residency for 12 months before applying. There’s also a “good character” assessment and a citizenship test with an English language requirement. This route is called citizenship by conferral.

If your parent is or was an Australian citizen and you weren’t born in the country, you can gain citizenship by descent.

We work closely with competent visa lawyers and other value chain partners so Contact us for a confidential discussion and refer family, friends and colleagues and be rewarded.

The 10 Best Places To Live In Australia | Study, Job Opportunities

Facebook Linkedin Youtube

Filed Under: Australia, Blog, Migration Tagged With: australia, immigration, jobs, opportunity, recruitment, visa

Brexit: Australian trade minister ‘can’t imagine’ visa-free travel deal with UK

13 January, 2020

‘Unfettered movement’ not likely to feature in post-Brexit talks, says Simon Birmingham

Australia has ruled out a post-Brexit trade deal involving visa-free travel and work arrangements with the UK.  The country’s trade minister, Simon Birmingham, said he “can’t imagine full and unfettered free movement” would be on the table during negotiations.

“We’re not into full negotiating mode and we will have to see what the UK aspires to, but noting that work rights and movement of people in the UK has been a big part of the European Union debate, I would be surprised if complete liberalisation around migration and labour rights was on their agenda,” Birmingham said during an interview in London with the Sydney Morning Herald.

His remarks follow suggestions by the UK international trade secretary, Liz Truss, during a visit to Australia in September of a deal to allow British citizens to live and work in the country visa-free.  Australia already has a free-movement deal with New Zealand.  About 120,000 Australians live in the UK, while 636,000 UK nationals were granted tourist, business or temporary visas in Australia in the last financial year.

Australians can visit the UK for less than six months without a visa but British tourists need one to enter Australia.

Senator Birmingham said he expected possible tweaks to existing immigration rules to allow “more flexibility”, but stressed his priority was trade.

“Negotiations for an FTA [free-trade agreement] between Australia and the UK will prioritise enhancing trade with a market that is already our eighth-largest trading partner.

“Work and visa settings may also form part of discussions but it is important to appreciate that there is a huge spectrum of grey between the black and white of no movement or unfettered movement.

“Once talks are launched with the UK we will work through all of these issues in the usual way,” he said

The UK is Australia’s eighth-largest trading partner, with two-way trade valued at A$26.9bn (£14bn) in 2018. Britain is also the second-largest source of total foreign investment in Australia.

We are keeping abreast with all things Brexit so feel free Contact us for a confidential discussion.

Brexit will 'lower trade barriers with the UK'

Facebook Linkedin Youtube

Filed Under: Australia, Blog, UK Tagged With: australia, immigration, international, jobs, residency, visa

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 12
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer Widget Header

CONTACT US TODAY FOR A CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSION!

Footer

CONTACT US

  • +61 (0) 477 915 800
  • +44 7861 269740 (UK)
  • info@thearistosgroup.com

© 2019 · The Aristos Group · All rights reserved · Website by Terri Love Designs